I believe the answer is: <span>If someone is asked to describe a meaningless, ambiguous stimulus, her response will be a projection of her inner thoughts and emotional processes.
By analyzing this response to ambiguous stimulus, the psychologist could analyze the subconscious mind that the subject have since the response would not be filtered by conscious desire to be seen in a positive light by other people near the subject.</span><span>
</span>
I would say D. Most consumers didn't stay away from the company
because if your trying to boycott something then you are protesting against that company and you are not using whatever that company has, so if the consumers didn't stay away then they would still use and be around the company and that is not the purpose of boycotting
Hope this helps!! :D
Answer:
A. The Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Explanation:
Basically, the Fourth Amendment is aimed at protection of citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. This is applicable on the person as well as the property. Hence, this gives a person the right to use constitution defending themselves and their property against unreasonable searches and seizures. This includes sobriety checkpoints or a house search as long as there is no clear reason or suspicion for a search.
<u>Between 1791 and 1804 the Saint-Domingue revolution in the West Indies led to the abolition of slavery in the former French colony and the establishment of Haiti, the second independent republic in the Western Hemisphere and the first Western nation governed by persons of African descent.</u>
