Colonist continued to smuggle sugar into the colony
The Conservative and the Labour I believe
Answer:
<em>The KKK experienced a resurgence in the 1920s because of its strong ties with the political atmosphere of the 1920s, and its guise of protecting morals and its expanded vigilante justice services beyond the usual Anglo-Saxon Protestantism of blacks, Jews, Catholics and immigrants, etc, to those they now perceived as lawbreakers like illegal gin runners, unfaithful spouses, corrupt public office holders, etc. They also introduced paid "kleagles" which inspired membership by millions of people.</em>
Explanation:
<em>During the 1920s, KKK experienced a resurgence by blending of their extreme acts with common acts</em>. With this new methods of administration, they were able to get sponsorship and sympathy from the general white populace, and were no longer seen as masked extremists but rather as a community fraternity organisation. <em>To make them look like they were on the side of the law, the KKK got involved with local vigilante services, and prosecuted many bootleggers and corrupt politicians and even perceived cheating wives, inciting what would appear as a form of moral guidance</em>. However, with all these new reforms and methods, their lynching and persecution of minority groups still remained, and a series of feuds within its political circle led to its demise late in the 1920s
William Penn, he was given a land grant of over 45,000 square miles of land from King Charles the second.Penn was going to name the land Sylvania, but the king insisted that he name the land to recognize his father who he owed, so he named the land Pennsylvania.The answer to that question is therefore William Penn.
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
