The still-face interaction paradigm
<span>An experimental task was introduced in 1978 to prove that infants actively contribute to social interaction. It is called the Still-Face Paradigm or SFP.</span>
<span>In the experiment, 3 phases of face-to-face interaction of infants with an adult were tested: the normal interaction, the still-face (where the adult becomes unresponsive and maintains a neutral facial expression), and a reunion where the adult resumes normal interaction.</span>
<span>Indeed, the still-face paradigm showed effects like increased gaze aversion and less smiling. </span>
Answer: c. $20,000
Explanation:
The Loss on Realization is monies accrued after assets have been sold off at less than their original value and in Calculating it, the following formula is used,
Loss on realization = Total Capital Balances after payment of liabilities minus - balance
Slotting in the figures therefore we have,
Loss on realization = $40,000 + $70,000 - $80,000
= $30,000 was the total loss on Realization
Seeing as Antonio and Barbara are partners who share income in the ratio of 1:2 we allocate to Barbara as follows,
Barbara = $30,000 * 2/(1+2)
= $20,000
Therefore option C is correct.
Answer:
tax increased = $22.22 billion
so correct option is 3. increase taxes by $22.22 billion.
Explanation:
given data
real GDP = $500 billion
employment GDP = $300 billion
marginal propensity = 0.9
solution
we know here that Inflationary gap will be
Inflationary gap = Real GDP - Full-employment GDP
Inflationary gap = $(500 - 300) billion
Inflationary gap = $200 billion
and tax Multiplier is
Tax Multiplier = 
Tax Multiplier = -9
here negative sign means that decrease real GDP by $9
so tax should be increased by $1
so we can say that decrease real GDP by $200 billion
and tax should be increased = 
tax increased = $22.22 billion
so correct option is 3. increase taxes by $22.22 billion.
Answer:
Jorge is not risk-averse
Explanation:
Risk averse means to reluctant to take risk
Since theres a 80% chance that Jorge will get laid off and end up with a job that will pay him $10000 less is very risky instead where he'll earn $30000 where the chance is 20% that he'll get the job.
The answer is true. Companies improve the pay through performance linkage. Discrepancies and unfairness can be reduced by introducing gainsharing, ESOPs, and other plans that use objective performance measures. Where subjective measures of performance are essential, companies should depend on on multiple sources of information. Companies also must apply rewards soon after the presentation occurs, and in a large-enough dose (such as an extra pay rather than a pay increase), so that employees experience positive emotions when they receive the reward.
