Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
Less popular open source products are not likely to attract the community of users and contributors necessary to help improve these products over time. This situation reiterates the belief that network effects are a key to success.
<h3>
What are Network Effects?</h3>
- The phenomenon known as the "network effect" describes how more individuals using a commodity or service results in a rise in value. An illustration of the network effect is the internet.
- Since the internet was first only useful to the military and a small number of researchers, there weren't many users.
- However, as more people had access to the internet, more material, information, and services were created by users.
- More people were drawn to connect and transact business with one another as a result of website development and enhancement. A network effect resulted from the internet offering more value as traffic increased.
know more about Network effects
brainly.com/question/28059618
#SPJ4
Answer:
Step 1: Include the date.
Step 2: Name the recipient.
Step 3: Fill in the amount with numerals.
Step 4: Write out the amount in words.
Step 5: Say what it's for.
Step 6: Sign your name.
Answer:
$7,000 was invested in Fund A
Explanation:
As per given Condition
A + B + C = $22,000 (1)
A5% + B8% = $750 (2)
As given
C = 2B
Placing C value in 1
A + B + 2B = $22,000
A +3B = $22,000 (3)
Multiplyin (2) by 20
A (0.05) x 20 + B (0.08) x 20 = $750 x 20
A + 1.6 B = $15,000 (4)
Subtracting (4) from (3)
A +3B - (A + 1.6 B ) = $22,000 - $15,000
A +3B - A - 1.6 B ) = $7,000
1.4 B = $7,000
B = $7,000 / 1.4
B = $5,000
As
C = 2B
C = 2 x $5000
C = $10,000
Placing value of B and C in (1)
A + $5000 + $10,000 = $22,000
A + $15,000 = $22,000
A = $22,000 - $15,000
A = $7,000
<u>CHECK</u>
A5% + B8% = $750
$7000 x 5% + $5,000 x 8% = $750
350 + $400 = $750
$750 = $750
I personally strongly disagree because you might control yourself but you can’t control what other people do around you.
