Answer: Costs of items used up this period but paid for next period
Explanation:
Period Expenses for the period are transactions that should be expensed because they were used in the current period.
Therefore if a period cost is not used in the period, it is not considered a period cost even if the company pays for it in the current period which also means that if a period cost for the period is not paid in the current period but in the next one, it is still a period cost for the current period.
From the above therefore, the period cost is the cost of items used up in this period but paid for in the next one.
The land purchased might look like the obvious choice but it is not because Assets are capitalised and not expensed.
Answer: A. You would raise your policy premium substantially and Sam would not accept because he doesn't know about the Japanese.
Explanation:
In such a scenario as the one described above, the best option as an Insurance Agent is indeed to raise premiums substantially.
As the Japanese will most probably get to market first with the new Mayonnaise Substitute, they will have the rights to it's invention and could even patent it.
This means that Sam and SCAM will most likely suffer a loss as a result of this.
As there is such a high chance of loss, charging a substantially higher premium to enable coverage is only logical and makes business sense.
Sam does not know however that the Japanese are so far ahead and having rejected a substantially lower offer, will reject the newer, substantially higher one as well.
The answer is C. Lobbying
It is a because if you think about it, you would budget for your future.
