1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
10

(20 Points) Can someone read this article and summarize it for me, please :)

English
1 answer:
mojhsa [17]3 years ago
7 0

This question is about how millennials are developing new technology into the future


You might be interested in
With heart of stone he was always rude identify figure of speech
pochemuha

Answer:

Heart of stone

Explanation:

The saying "Heart of stone" is a figure of speech, you can't actually have a heart made of stone.

4 0
2 years ago
What happens at the end of the story as a result of the three events?
Alchen [17]

Answer:

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Explanation:

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

Why are you talking help in french wow u bad

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
The experience of the pilgrims on the mayflower and the settlement of polymouth
maksim [4K]
It would be horrable, bc all of the illinesses and no food
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following sentences uses spatial organization? ​
klemol [59]

Answer: all

Explanation: all

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A. Read each sentence. Underline the prepositional phrase in each
    6·1 answer
  • The fact that an article is on-line tells us that it is reliable and worthy of being quoted in a paper or project we are researc
    6·1 answer
  • An essay explaining how people can work together to make a difference.
    13·1 answer
  • Which words and phrases from the text help establish the overall subject of the poem? Check the three boxes that best apply.
    14·1 answer
  • The next summer, I wanted something better than
    5·1 answer
  • Is the following sentence a fact or an opinion? Explain your answer." The waves
    5·1 answer
  • Which sentence is correctly written?
    12·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from "The Gift of the Magi."
    9·1 answer
  • What did you discuss in your response? check all that apply. how the poems are similar how the poems are different the structure
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!