Answer:
there will be a surplus of retail workers in this labor market.
Explanation:
In the attached diagram the scenario is illustrated.
When the minimum wage is above the equilibrium wage it means that the minimum wage is above what employees are willing to pay workers. So employees will be less wiling to pay this amount.
There will be a reduction in the number of available slots for workers.
On the other hand workers will receive higher wage than they expected but since the slots for work are now limited there will be a surplus of labour in the market
Answer:
b. $ 2,000 overapplied
Explanation:
Firstly, we need to determine the predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor costs.
Estimated total manufacturing Overhead $ 350,000
Estimated direct labour costs $ 200,000
Predetermined overhead rate $ 350,000 / $ 200,000 $ 1.75 per $ of direct labour costs.
The total manufacturing overhead <u>applied</u> on direct labor costs of $ 208,000, is:
$ 208,000 * $ 1.75 <u> </u>$ 364,000
Actual overhead costs incurred <u>$ 362,000</u>
Manufacturing overhead over applied <u> $ 2,000</u>
Answer:
D, decline in total surplus that results from a tax.
Explanation:
Dead-weight loss is also known as excess burden. It is a situation where in there is a loss of economic sufficiency as a result of tax.
This economic sufficiency is when the supply of goods and services aren't met. That is, there is no market equilibrium between demand and supply. Taxes, subsidies, price rise or fall can be the reason for dead-weight loss as it causes the imbalance of demand and supply of goods or services to the consumers through price manipulations.
To calculate dead-weight loss, change in price as well as change in quantity demanded are important factors to consider.
Cheers.
Answer:
Decrease of $18,000
Explanation:
As there is a payment of dividend so it would reduce the stockholder equity by $50,000
And, there is an increase in account receivable for rendering the service that means the service revenue would increased so the stockholder equity would increased by $32,000
Now the net effect would be
= -$50,000 + $32,000
= -$18,000
Answer:
An ethical lapse is a mistake or error in judgement that produces a harmful outcome (Roslyn Frenz, n.d., para. ... Otherwise there are grave consequences for such ethical lapses and could result in widespread harm to the company and to the society at large.
In both situations presented, I believe them to be ethical dilemmas. An ethical dilemma is considered to be a problem between two possibilities that are not acceptable or preferable. Making a choice between the two would result in hurting the other. Employing the child is wrong because of labor laws, but the child is able to provide for themselves because of it. Taking away the employment would make the child homeless and hungry. The second scenario is also a dilemma because you run the risks of loosing profits if you do things the correct way. Neither choice would result in a preferable outcome. Doing the right thing sometimes comes with a price.
Explanation:
Examples of ethical lapses include business-related misconduct such as fraud, bribery, insider trading, and environmental disasters involving negligence or recklessness. They also include personal ethical misconduct, such as inflated résumés and sexual indiscretions.
