Answer: By definition, generational wealth represents assets passed down from one generation to the next. If you can leave behind a notable inheritance to your descendants, that constitutes generational wealth. These assets can include real estate, stock market investments, a business, or anything else which contains monetary value.
People who inherit generational wealth have a significant financial advantage over those who do not. They likely have the ability to avoid student loans as well as other types of costly debt. Instead, their inheritance could go towards income-generating investments, assets which appreciate in value, or even towards purchasing their first home.
Explanation: To generate wealth you can pass on, you need to acquire assets or save money you won’t need to spend in retirement. You then pass down the money and assets to children or other younger relatives.
While the concept is simple, unless you had wealth passed down to you, accumulating extra assets can be slow. Fortunately, it’s entirely possible if you are strategic with your finances. These four strategies are the most accessible paths toward building generational wealth.
I believe the answer is <span>Technical Writing
</span><span>Unlike fictional writing, Technical Writing is most commonly aimed to improve/deepen readers knowledge upon a specific topic.
</span>Usually written by someone that already an expert/has experience in that specific field.
Answer: authoritative parent
Explanation:Mazie's mom set reasonable demand since she is loving and caring which means she expect the best from her child and as a loving parent she probably trust her child since she also allows verbal give and take.
She involves her child in decision making and allow her to express her own views.
<span>-He describes the extreme rituals that people hold in America which he introduces his topic, ritual activity, "the focus" of which is the human body, the appearance and health of which looms as a dominant concern in the ethos of the people.</span>
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
