Answer:
A)The "like me" bias
B)Ethnocentrism
C)prejudice
D)Ethnocentrism
E)Perceived threat of loss
F)Stereotype
Explanation:
.
Answer (1)
<em>False</em>
Explanation:
Getting a paycheck is not what most people want out of their job, <em>studies have shown that some people, contrary to the general believe actually look for other things asides paycheck from their jobs.</em> Some of these factors that encourages people into finding fulfillment in their jobs includes permanent flexibility of the working time, commitment into to health and well being of the staffs by the employer of these people, etc. <em>This factors creates a sense of purpose in the workers, encouraging them to put their body and soul into the job without thinking too much about the paycheck.</em>
Answer (2)
<em>True</em>
Explanation:
<em>Different people have different reasons for working</em>, although some just work for the paycheck, others are driven by a sense of purpose among other things. To some people, the work setting provides a sort of belonging and gives them the impression of working in a team, which is what most people actually want.
Answer (3)
<em>2. Belongingness</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
As stated, some workers just want the setting that provides a sense of belonging and security within a team. <em>This type of workers are not too concerned with the paycheck increase that comes with a promotion if it takes them away from their perceived team.</em>
Answer: Harrison will acknowledge a gain equal to the difference between his basis and the distribution . This is because he receives only money in the distribution and the amount transcend his basis in KH. He further allot his entire basis in KH to the basis in the money received resulting in $0 basis in KH after the distribution.
∴ <em>The capital gain will be $6000 i.e. (50000 - 44000) and $0 basis.</em>
Answer:
multiply by 3
Explanation:
it doesn't make sense at first but when you add it all up you get a solid3.1 but you round it to the nearest 10th and get 3
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
