Segmented pricing is a situation, when seller or a company establishes different prices (two or more), for one the same product.
Price segmentation, to put it simply, is the process of differentiating pricing based on willingness to pay. It is motivated by the reality that customers' price sensitivity might differ greatly from one another, from one product to another, and throughout all the environments in which they use your product.
With price segmentation, you may set different prices for various consumer types according to their willingness and ability to pay. Price segmentation allows you to profit more from consumers who spend the most and less from those who pay the least.
Learn more about Price segmentation here
brainly.com/question/14225381
#SPJ4
Answer:
She will have $16,772.59 more in the second investment.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Recently she received an inheritance of $54,000 from her grandmother's estate. She plans to use the money for the down payment on a home in ten years when she finishes her education.
We need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
First savings account:
FV= 54,000*(1+0.04)^10= $79,933.19
Second investment:
FV= 54,000*(1+0.06)^10= $96,705.78
She will have (96,705.78 - 79,933.19) $16,772.59 more in the second investment.
The statement " Incorporators are required to sign the charter, deliver it to the proper state officials, and purchase a certain percentage of the initial stock offering " is FALSE.
Explanation:
Incorporation of a business means making a company officially known by the company's sole property or general partner. If a company forms, it becomes a legal structure separating the individuals who founded the company.
Even though a company does not have a office there, the company must always have a registered agent within the state of incorporation.
Incorporation provides shareholders with immunity from personal liability for the company's debts.
Answer:
mom what do you mean by this like what
Answer:
He could afford to spend $133,411 for the device now.
Explanation:
The maximum the surgeon could afford for the device is equal to the sum of present value of the lawsuit costs that he can avoid in year 2 and year 5 which is:
+ Year 2: 600,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 600,000 * 10% = $60,000;
+ Year 5: 1,350,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 1,350,000 * 10% = $135,000.
=> The amount he can afford for the device = 60,000 / 1.1^2 + 135,000 / 1.1^5 = $133,411.
So, the answer is $133,411.
