Answer:
Government spending would have to change by <u>$1.6 billion</u>
Explanation:
The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) refers to the proportion of an increase in aggregate income that is spent on consumption of commodities by a consumer.
Since from the question, we have:
MPC = Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75
The MPC can therefore be used to calculate the fiscal multiplier which measures the effect of government spending on real GDP as follows:
Fiscal multiplier = 1 / (1 - MPC) = 1 / (1 - 0.75) = 1 / 0.25 = 4.0
Therefore, we have:
Change in government spending = Fiscal multiplier * Amount of targeted increase real GDP = 4.0 * $400 million = $1.6 billion
Therefore, government spending would have to change by <u>$1.6 billion</u> to generate $400 million increase in real GDP.
The shareholders have the authority to remove a director in this scenario when only one member of the board of directors refuses to step down.
What is board of directors?
A board of directors, also known as the board or simply the board, is an executive committee that collectively oversees the operations of an organisation. This organisation may be for-profit or nonprofit, such as a <u>company, nonprofit, or government agency</u>.
Governmental regulations, including the corporate law of the applicable jurisdiction, as well as the organization's possess constitution and by-laws, set forth the rights, obligations, and obligations of a board of directors. These authorities may determine the number of board members, the process for selecting them, and the frequency of their meetings.
The full membership of an organisation that has voting members, who typically elect the board members, is responsible to and may be subordinate to the board in such an organisation.
Because In general, the sole authority to remove a director rests with the shareholders. A resolution to remove a director must be approved by a majority of shareholders at a special general meeting.
To learn more about board of directors
brainly.com/question/28201050
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:</u>
On the off chance that you <em>kick the bucket</em> during the term, a passing advantage is paid out. On the off chance that you don't pass on during the term, the approach ends toward the finish of the term.
A noteworthy advantage of this sort of approach is that the excellent cash come back to you is <em>totally tax-exempt,</em> as it isn't viewed as salary yet just a discount of premiums.
As you're looking into term <em>life coverage approach choices,</em> you may go over the expression yearly sustainable premium.
Be that as it may, for an every year <em>sustainable premium term approach</em>, the top notch will build every year. After some time it's conceivable to pay more in premiums than what might have been paid for a <em>level premium term approach.</em>
Requisitioning an OTC item to use for script fulfillment included is scanning the price barcode in the QT exception screen.
For the fulfillment of medication requests corresponding to included medication units, a system and accompanying technique are offered.
A patient care provider may receive decision data from requisition fulfillment logic to aid in choosing one of a variety of fulfillment venues to fill a specific drug demand.
A requisition router may direct the pharmaceutical request to a particular fulfillment site among the many options.
In respect to the related medication requisitions that they have completed, the fulfillment sites may provide medication requisition metadata (such as information about the preparation and handling of medicine units) to a medication requisition database.
Therefore, scanning the price barcode in the QT exception screen. is the answer.
Learn more about Router:
brainly.com/question/14449935
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. $275 million
Yes
2. 30%
Explanation:
Calculation for the NPV of the investment opportunity
NPV = –100 + 30/0.08
NPV= $275 million
Therefore the NPV will be $275 million
Yes, Based on the above Calculation they should make the investment
2. Calculation for IRR
IRR: 0 = –100 + 30/IRR
Hence,
IRR = 30/100
IRR = 30%
Therefore the IRR will be 30%
The IRR is great only in a situation where the cost of capital does not go beyond 30%.
