The Right Response is Option C which is Long Term Changes in the Economy.
<h3><u>
Why Did Friedman Argued So?</u></h3>
- The concept of monetarism, which refers to the management of money in the economy, was developed by Milton Friedman. According to Friedman, changes in the money supply can have both long- and short-term consequences.
Friedman suggested that long-term changes in the economy had an impact on consumer behavior. Long-term economic developments have an impact on how consumers behave while making purchases. For instance, if long-term economic trends are favorable, consumer spending will rise; otherwise, it would fall.
Therefore, "long-term changes in the economy" is the right response.
To learn more about Long Term Changes in the Economy. Click the links.
brainly.com/question/20822981
#SPJ4
Correct Question - Milton Friedman argued that consumers are more likely to alter their behavior based on
a) changes in the unemployment rate.
b) short-term changes in the economy.
c) long-term changes in the economy.
d) changes in the inflation rate.
Contraction, which causes a decrease in economic activity.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
If Janet Decides to make height and base half, then the area is multiplied by 1/4.
New height according to Janet = 25 ft / 2 = 12.5 ft
New Length of garden = 30 ft / 2 = 15 ft
Area of garden = Length x height
= 15 x 12.5
= 187.5
Total amount spend on this land = Area of garden x Cost
= 187.5 x $9.50
= $1781.25
Therefore, she will have to pay $1781.25
If you were to sit in a local fast-food restaurant and record what people ordered, you would be using <u>"naturalistic observation descriptive method".</u>
When utilizing naturalistic observation, researchers gather data about subjects by watching them unpretentiously, without interfering with them in any capacity. Analysts make a record of occasions and note connections among those occasions. With naturalistic perception, specialists confront the test of getting an unmistakable perspective of occasions without getting to be detectable to the subjects.
Answer:
$5,308
Explanation:
amortization June 30:
($369,908 x 6%) - ($400,000 x 5.5%) = $22,194 - $22,000 = $194
amortization December 31:
($370,102 x 6%) - $22,000 = $22,206 - $22,000 = $206
bond's carrying value = $370,102 + $206 = $370,308
The carrying value of the bonds was $370,308 on December 31, but the market value was only $365,000. Any decrease in the market value of a liability must be reported as a gain under total comprehensive income.