Answer: False.
Explanation:
False.
This indicates that the two goods are substitute goods, not the complementary goods.
In case of complementary goods, the price of one good is inversely related with the demand for other related good. For example, car and petrol; if the price of petrol increases as a result demand for cars decreases.
In case of substitute goods, the price of one good is directly related with the demand for other related good. For example, tea and coffee; if the price of coffee increases as a result demand for tea increases. So, there is a positive relationship between the price of one good and demand for the other good.
<span>Blackwelder
co. calls a meeting to announce to the media that it is hiring a new
ceo and changing the company name to natural basics. the company will
distribute additional materials at this meeting, which is called a press conference.
</span><span>A press conference is a meeting organized for the purposes of distributing information to the media and answering questions from reporters.</span>
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
<span>This is a tricky question, because
most of the answers provided are correct. For instance, by raising taxes, the
government drops down the demand rates, as well as by decreasing the money
supply (in that case, it also prevents economy from falling into an inflating
situation). As for balancing the budget, this economical move entails
decreasing the public expenditure and, therefore, contracting the demanding economical
figures too. </span>
