What evidence is there that the colonists had already and unsuccessfully voiced their concerns to the king? "In every stage of these Oppressions, We have Petitioned for redress..." but "Our repeated petitions have only been answered by repeated injury."
Answer:
Isolates
Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.
Bystanders
Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.
Participants
Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.
Activists
Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.
Diehards
Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.
Explanation:
For the first part of the question I would go with B.
Pamela scores high on openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness and optimism and low on neuroticism and risk taking which would indicate that she is more than capable of being left to get on with the project with no problems and her supervisor can be friendly and warm towards her.
For the second part of the question I would go with D.
Pamela has average analytical intelligence, high practical intelligence and linguistic intelligence and very high emotional intelligence. This would indicate that she would not do well with the most difficult analytical aspects of the project, she would do well with the common sense part, she would do well with the written parts and she would do especially well with the emotional part of the project.
<span>I think a good sentence could be: During today's plebiscite, ninth grade students were able to use direct democracy.
</span><span>
</span><span>Direct or pure democracy is when power is exercised by the people in an assembly directly. They are used to perform attributions such as the approval or the repeal of laws. There are 5 forms of direct democracy: the popular initiative, the referendum, the avocation, the plebiscite, and the recall.
</span><span>
</span><span>I hope this information can help you.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
One of these beautiful things about the United States legislature is how much force that minority party has to prevent or boring government. It would be the shame to miss this and to move the assembly into another edition of the House of Representatives with the only difference being the members-only have more massive egos. And all filibustering chairman Trump's appointment of Justice Gorsuch, with no strategy, endgame, or knowing, ensures is this is just what would happen. As the conservative who saw himself at the minority in recent years fighting back against President Obama, I realize the allure of engaging in fights yet possibly useless things all too well. We do get grounds to appease, after all. Still, I believe you can rue that time you pushed Mitch McConnell's finger to push the nuclear switch at the shortsighted revenge turn at Merrick garland's failed appointment.