Answer:
The Partition was caused in part by the two nation theory's presented by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, because of presented religion issues, Pakistan became a Muslim country, and India remained a secular country.
Explanation: Hope this helps!! Plz give 5 star, thanks, and brainliest thxxxxx
Japanese employees work extremely long hours with no extra pay. There have been several instances of people physically working themselves to death. Employees are not protected my employment laws like in western cultures. Japanese work culture revolves around pleasing your superiors and not being seen as a failure to your colleagues by putting your own needs before the needs of the company. Japanese workers are not seen as individuals but as part of a collective. The level of emotional well being among Japanese workers is very low and negative. They are not encouraged to look after their own well being and health. They are constantly at risk of severe mental and physical health problems due to overwork and lack of concern for their well being by employers.
I think it is false might not be correct though
Great Britain fought in the French and Indian War also known as Seven Years' War.
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
