<span>Supreme Court of Oregon affirmed. Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It was used to justify both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws. ... The ruling had important implications for protective labor legislation.</span>
Texicans organizing themselves to influence government is a Fundamental right.
There are <u>four types of rights:</u>
- Legal rights: They come from other acts of legislation.
- Fundamental rights: They are provided in the constitution.
- Human rights
- Cultural rights
The <u>Fundamental rights</u> include the following:
- Right to liberty
- Right to self-determination
- Right to freedom of movement
- Right to due process of law
- Right to freedom of thought
- Right to freedom of religion
- Right to freedom of expression
- Right to freedom of association
- Right to freedom of assembly
In this particular case, Texicans are using their <u>right to freedom of assembly</u>, which is defined as: The right of people to <u>collectively express and pursue their shared ideas</u>.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:
Explanation:
▼ Coffee beans purchased by a coffee shop (intermediate good)
▼ One share of Google stock (neither)
▼ A new pick-up truck purchased by a consumer (final good)
▼ A new home purchased by a family (final good)
