Answer:
WE NOT FINNA READ ALL THIS YOU CRAZY
Answer:
<h3>a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.</h3>
Explanation:
- Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.
- The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.
Answer:
Fingerprints, Footwear Impressions, Tools & Toolmarks, Blood, Fibers, Suspects, Extra things from the burgler (personal items such as a wallet)
Explanation:
Answer:
Testimonial evidence
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.
In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1
