1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shtirlitz [24]
3 years ago
15

3.5v=161 Does v=46 ?

Mathematics
2 answers:
MrMuchimi3 years ago
6 0
Yes it would because you would divide 3.5 from both sides
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
4 0

yes it would

Step-by-step explanation:

bevause it's hoj

You might be interested in
(4x2 - 6x + 1) divided by (x-2)
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How do you do this....
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

Answer is "No real Solution"

4 0
3 years ago
One-fourth of a number is 3 more than one-seventh of the same number.<br> What is the number?
uysha [10]
I set it up as an equation. 1/4x = 1/7x + 3. After you solve it out, it’s 28.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help with this question
SVEN [57.7K]
It is c. Because the original slope is -3 and perpendicular is opposite. So the perp slope is 1/3. C is the answer.
6 0
3 years ago
* Let S = Span {(2,-1, 1), (3, 1, 1), (1, 2, 0)}. (i) Calculate the dimension of S.
Sholpan [36]

The span of 3 vectors can have dimension at most 3, so 9 is certainly not correct.

Check whether the 3 vectors are linearly independent. If they are not, then there is some choice of scalars c_1,c_2,c_3 (not all zero) such that

c_1 (2,-1,1) + c_2 (3,1,1) + c_3 (1,2,0) = (0,0,0)

which leads to the system of linear equations,

\begin{cases} 2c_1 + 3c_2 + c_3 = 0 \\ -c_1 + c_2 + 2c_3 = 0 \\ c_1 + c_2 = 0 \end{cases}

From the third equation, we have c_1=-c_2, and substituting this into the second equation gives

-c_1 + c_2 + 2c_3 = 2c_2 + 2c_3 = 0 \implies c_2 + c_3 = 0 \implies c_2 = -c_3

and in turn, c_1=c_3. Substituting these into the first equation gives

2c_1 + 3c_2 + c_3 = 2c_3 - 3c_3 + c_3 = 0 \implies 0=0

which tells us that any value of c_3 will work. If c_3 = t, then c_1=t and c_2 = -t. Therefore the 3 vectors are not linearly independent, so their span cannot have dimension 3.

Repeating the calculations above while taking only 2 of the given vectors at a time, we see that they are pairwise linearly independent, so the span of each pair has dimension 2. This means the span of all 3 vectors taken at once must be 2.

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Mountain Men era come to an end?
    12·1 answer
  • As part of a statistics project, Andrea would like to collect data on household size in her city. To do so, she asks each person
    6·1 answer
  • 2.53 × 3.1 is between
    12·1 answer
  • Waht is 4 x 5 i just learnt multipalcashin
    8·2 answers
  • a box shaped like a rectangular prism has a height of 17 in and a volume of 2720 in^3. the length is 4 inches greater than twice
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!! What is the percent of increase from 22.9 to 75.2? Round your answer to the nearest
    8·1 answer
  • You created a scale drawing with the scale 1:8. The client asked you to change it to a scale of 1:10. Will your revised drawing
    5·2 answers
  • Whats the unit rate 140 mi in 3.5 h
    14·2 answers
  • Find the sum of 37, 9, 663, 1198, and 45<br>a. 1952<br>b. 1142<br>c. 942<br>d. 3952<br>e. 2722<br>​
    15·2 answers
  • X=1/4 Y=2/3 Z= 4 1/5
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!