Answer:
C. The appropriate balance between observing social injustice and seeking social justice.
Explanation:
This issue is strongly debated by modern-day sociologists, because our social order seems to be innately unjust. There are people who start from worse premises than others, there are people who earn less than others and people who will earn more and there is no society without inequality.
<em>This inequality is considered "social injustice" by modern-day sociologists and philosophers, whereas other voices claim that this kind of "injustice" is not something which can be corrected. </em>
<em>The main idea is that there will always be inequalities in any given society. </em>However, <u>the big question is how big these inequalities should be and how much state interference should there be to diminish these inequalities? </u>Moreover, even with state interference, could inequalities ever be wiped out?
This is what modern-day sociologists are trying to answer, in order to build better societies without imposing too many things on individuals who are faring better than others just by birth.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
"Operation Rolling Thunder" was the codename given to the United States' strategy or action of using massive bombs during the Vietnam war in 1965.
It was a significant change in American strategy in the war because it increased military pressure on North Vietnam's communist leaders, affecting their military capacity to continue fighting against South Vietnam, whom the United States supports.
It was recorded that the United States used about 643,000 bombs, and the financial cost of the bomb effect to North Vietnam is about 300 million dollars.
The correct answer should be remorse. Hope this helps.
