Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) is the Federal which gives continuous health cover to private employees.
Explanation:
Federal law that requires most employers to provide continuing health insurance coverage to employees and their dependents who are no longer eligible for the company's health insurance program That is., in case of job loss or any qualifying event.
It provides the financial security of the workers and it is considered to be the landmark federal law which covers the employees own self and its family members. COBRA only applies to health plans offered by private-sector employers with more than 20 employees, as well as to state and local governments. It doesn't apply to the federal government, churches, or some church-related organizations.
The answer to this statement whether if it is true or false is that, it is false. It is because self-regulated people can create an environment that produces trust and fairness but because self-regulated people tend to be more controlling to their behavior and emotions, it does not necessarily that they can only produce fairness. While political behavior can be reduced based on some instances but it does not necessarily impact of the behavior and infighting to be reduced within the instance though productivity is high.
It is true becouse international is between two or more countries.
Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.
