Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Sophie is willing to sell a textbook for $30, while Ruby is willing to purchase it for $60. Both negotiate and agree on a price of $45.
The gain for Sophie will be the difference between the minimum price she was expecting and the price she gets for the textbook.
Gain for Sophie
= $45 - $30
= $15
The gain for Ruby will be the difference between the maximum price she was willing to pay and the price she actually paid.
Gain for Ruby
= $60 - $45
= $15
So, both of them have a gain of $15 from trade.
Answer:
it may be fixed order interval because the vendor is restocking every monday only.
After a firm has determined its position in the global market, it will typically seek to meet the needs of global markets by tailoring its marketing mix to the needs of consumers in individual markets.
<h3>What is global market?</h3>
Global market involves planning, producing, placing, and promoting a business' products or services in the worldwide market.
It is not limited to specific geographic locations but rather involves the exchange of good, services, and labor anywhere.
Examples of global markets are :
- Fast-moving consumer goods
- Clothing
- Automobiles
- Banking,
- Fast food companies
Hence, a firm will typically seek to meet the needs of global markets by tailoring its marketing mix to the needs of consumers in individual markets.
Learn more about global market here : brainly.com/question/20860719
Answer:
Explanation:
This action will not result in a 2 year ban on the municipal broker dealer conducting municipal securities business with that issuer because the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
( MSRB )rule only applies to the Municipal Finance Professional
( MFPs )
Answer:
She should follow their advise by mentioning the opponents impending indictment
Explanation:
Based on ethics, except a person has been tried and found to be guilty, he or she is innocent. By bringing up a case of this indictment, there would be a violation of the ethical rights of this opponent by Felicia.
But again, we have to put the school into consideration. If this opponent had really done these unethical things as projected by Felicia, then it would be an unethical treatment on her part to the entire school which would be in the hands of such a person.
So on Felicia's art we have to consider two things, unethical treatment toward school by not mentioning the opponents indictment and also unethical treatment towards the opponent by bringing up the indictment
For me I think, the ethical thing for her to do would be to mention the impending indictment of the opponent.
Thank you!
