Yea I wanna say you have the right answer
D would be the correct answer. Post brainliest if this helped plz :)
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, we are to give the reason why we would reject the null hypothesis during the hypothesis testing.
In considering whether to accept the null hypothesis or reject the null hypothesis, we have to take into consideration two things.
The p-value and the alpha value. The p-value refers to the probability which is directly obtainable from the standard score which is referred to as the z-score while the alpha refers to the level of significance.
Now, when the p-value is less than alpha, we simply reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. In a case however, we have the value of p greater than or equal to the significance level alpha, we simply accept the null hypothesis in this case.
The question asks for a rejection case and this can happen only when the p-value is less than the level of significance alpha
is the inequality that describes this problem
<h3><u>Solution:</u></h3>
Given that Travis can spend no more than $125.75 every month
To find: linear inequality that describes the problem
Let the amount spent on movies = x dollars
Given that Travis decided to spend 4.3 times as much money on video games as he spends on movies
Amount spent on video games = 4.3 (amount spent on movies)
Amount spent on video games = 4.3x
Travis can spend no more than $125.75. That is, he can spend less than or equal to $125.75
<em><u>Thus, the inequality representing the situation is:</u></em>
Thus the required inequality is found
