The entity integrity rule states that a primary key attribute can be null. Thus the statement is false.
<h3>What is an entity?</h3>
An entity is refer to any object that exists in reality. These entities are Independent in nature. Each row in a table should be a distinct entity, which is ensured by entity integrity.
The entity integrity rule states that a primary key attribute can not be null as it shows unique characteristics of an entity.No primary key value can be null according to the entity integrity constraint because it is needed to identify specific attribute values in relation.
Therefore, the statement is False.
learn more about entity integrity, here:
brainly.com/question/19593791
#SPJ4
Explanation: Perception is a subjective experience of an event, as well as an active process in which a sense of an experienced event develops, interpreted on the basis of sensory information, and this information determines how we experienced a particular event, people or ourselves. How we will experience an event etc, is influenced by many factors and also physiological.
The physiological factor, which therefore influences perception, and also the differences in perception, is a factor that originates from the physiological state and which affects how we receive sensory information. If one is satiated he will experience differently than one who is hungry, a beggar who begs for some food. So, for example, the menstrual cycle also affects perception, biological cycles, our body temperature, then general health, physical fitness, etc. The physiological factor is therefore related to the state of the body and has a great influence on the way of thinking, i.e perception. A change in thinking happens because a physiological factor affects changes in the brain.
This is similar to the symptom of schizophrenia called inappropriate affect. An inappropriate effect is an emotional expression that is inadequate or inharmonious with the situation or the event that is taking place, due to its intensity or quality. In Tourette disorder, the person cannot regulate this symptom despite being aware of the inappropriateness of his message and behavior.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
Answer:
Clause 18 from Article 1 Section 8
Explanation:
Clause 18 from Article 1 Section 8 granted the power to the government make all Laws which shall be necessary to carried out their main duties that is directly written on the constitution.
This single clause alone, granted so much flexibility for the government to create agencies and regulations that are not directly written/regulated for them within the constitution.
Example of the usage of this would be the creation The First and Second Banks of the United States, They does not necessarily written on the Constitution, but the government use it to control and regulate the economy of the nation as a whole.
