Suppose you have read two different books on World War II, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Whic
h of the following sources provides the best support for the authors' arguments? A. A World War II history website made by high school students for a final project.
B. An article claiming that World War II was the most important war in history.
C. A set of diary entries written by generals who planed strategies during World War II.
D. A review of the two books written by a popular national newspaper columnist.
D would be the most appropriate. C and B would be very bias, especially since C was written by a general in World War II, meaning that it would only be his point of view and not the other argument. D, is by a trustworthy newspaper columnist (since it's popular) who has read both books and written a view on both which would most likely not be very bias.
