Tell them to wait patiently, and give them a
drink
Answer:
a. a subsidy so that the firm can operate where marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost.
Explanation:
The private company is producing when the marginal revenue matches the marginal cost. The governemtn will want to decrease the cost (that's by subsidize the activity) to match the marginal revenue considering the positive externalities.
The government will do a pigouvian subsidy.
The government reasons to go for this is that the good or services provide positive externalities Which are enjoy by people who doens't purchase the good. Thus, this subsidy will increase the amount of ooutput thus, generating a better social benefit.
Answer:
a. ROE (r) = 13% = 0.13
EPS = $3.60
Expected dividend (D1) = 50% x $3.60 = $1.80
Plowback ratio (b) = 50% = 0.50
Cost of equity (ke) = 12% = 0.12
Growth rate = r x b
Growth rate = 0.13 x 0.50 = 0.065
Po= D1/Ke-g
Po = $1.80/0.12-0.065
Po = $1.80/0.055
Po = $32.73
P/E ratio = <u>Current market price per share</u>
Earnings per share
P/E ratio = <u>$32.73</u>
$3.60
P/E ratio = 9.09
b. ER(S) = Rf + β(Rm - Rf)
ER(S) = 5 + 1.2(13 - 5)
ER(S) = 5 + 9.6
ER(S) = 14.6%
Explanation:
In the first part of the question, there is need to calculate the expected dividend, which is dividend pay-our ratio of 50% multiplied by earnings per share. We also need to calculate the growth rate, which is plowback ratio multiplied by ROE. Then, we will calculate the current market price, which equals expected dividend divided by the difference between return on stock (Ke) and growth rate. Finally, the price-earnings ratio is calculated as current market price per share divided by earnings per share.
In the second part of the question, Cost of equity (return on stock) is a function of risk-free rate plus beta multiplied by market risk-premium. Market risk premium is market return minus risk-free rate.
Answer and Explanation:
A. When the employees are more educated and have the higher income as compared with the less educated employees so here education would be indepedent variable and the income is dependent variable. Also the relationship between these two variables i.e. education and income is positive
Therefore the same is relevant
Answer:
a. Variable costing income from operations <u>is greater than </u>absorption costing income from operations.
b. $870,000
Explanation:
a. Under Variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost under Variable costing are;
= 114 * 14,500
= $1,653,000
Under Absorption Costing, both fixed and variable costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost therefore is;
= (114 + 60) * 14,500
= $2,523,000
Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income from operations because Absorption costs yields more cost.
b.= Absorption cost - Variable cost
= 2,523,000 - 1,653,000
= $870,000
<em>Variable costing income from operation will be $870,000 higher than Absorption costing income from operations.</em>
