1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
4 years ago
8

A data set includes weights of garbage discarded in one week from 62 different households. The paired weights of paper and glass

were used to obtain the results shown to the right. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between weights of discarded paper and​ glass? Use a significance level of alpha equals 0.05. correlation​ matrix: Variables Paper Glass Paper 1 0.1853 Glass 0.1853
Mathematics
1 answer:
lara [203]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correlation​ matrix provided is:

Variables    Paper     Glass

  Paper           1         0.1853

 Glass        0.1853         1

Te hypothesis for the test is:

<em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> = 0 vs. <em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> ≠ 0

The test statistic is:

<em>r</em> = 0.1853 ≈ 0.185

As the alternate hypothesis does not specifies the direction of the test, the test is two tailed.

The critical value for the two-tailed test is:

r_{\alpha/2, (n-2)}=r_{0.05/2, (62-2)}=r_{0.05/2, 60}=0.250

The conclusion is:

Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.

You might be interested in
On August 19, 2002, the ratio of stocks gaining value on the New York Stock
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

D: 1868

Step-by-step explanation:

43:20 ratio

43/20 = 2.15

869 * 2.15 = 1,868.35

round down to nearest whole number

1,868

5 0
3 years ago
How to solve an inequality
kirill [66]
Look on Google or ask your teacher
6 0
3 years ago
Can anyone answer this question???
Leona [35]

Answer:

E = 216 joules

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation is

E = \frac{m*v^{2} }{2}                ............(i)

Here

m = 3 kg

v = 12 m/s

Putting the given values in equation (i)

E = \frac{3*12^{2} }{2}

E = \frac{3*144}{2}

E = \frac{432}{2}

E = 216 kg m² /s²

or

E = 216 joules

6 0
3 years ago
yasmine bought 6 gallons of apple juice. after filing up 4 bottles of the same juice, she had 0.3 gallons of apple juice left. W
Mazyrski [523]
6 - 0.3 = 5.7 gallons

5.7/4 = 1.425 gallons in each bottle
6 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! DUE TOMORROW
aniked [119]
3 times it could be an even number and a tail. 3 out of 12 AKA 1/4
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4. In a factory, 15 of every 300 light bulbs
    6·1 answer
  • Which coordinate pair is a solution to the following system? A- (0.20) B-(1,-3) C(5,5) D-(13,20
    6·1 answer
  • Find the product.<br> (x + 9)(4x2 + 5x + 6)
    6·2 answers
  • Please help
    10·1 answer
  • In general how does perimeter "a" affect y=a(b x-c)?​
    11·1 answer
  • What if you divide the hexagon into 3 equal parts? Write a sentence that compares the area of each equal part of the hexagon to
    12·1 answer
  • PLSSS help !!! find n AND m no need to show work
    5·2 answers
  • Three fill in the blanks
    7·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASE DON'T HAVE MUCH TIME TO FINISH!
    5·2 answers
  • Hiiii help pls TvT .,.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!