Answer:
Make your questions objective and friendly.
Explanation:
An interview is an essential step in the process of selecting a candidate to fill a position in a company.
Through the interview, verbal and non-verbal data are collected that will help in the relationship between the profile of the interviewed candidate and the profile expected to fill the vacancy.
It is important that the interviewer uses some techniques to make the interview flow effectively, the first of which is to maintain a friendly posture, as it is common for candidates for an interview to feel intimidated or anxious due to the selection process.
It is also essential that the questions are objective and honest, so that there is a correct understanding and the candidate can answer correctly and effectively.
And the interview should be a step that does not cause intimidation and lack of ethics on both sides, it is ideal that the candidate feels motivated to ask relevant questions to answer their doubts, and that the interviewer conducts the interview schedule in an effective way.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
Answer : rent to own business !
shes paying for her to own it but still gets to take it home
There are 4 jacks in the deck.
13 are clubs and 26 are all red cards.
The computation for the following problems are shown below:
a.
All are jacks
Computation: 4/52 * 3/51 * 2/50 = 1/5525
b.
All are clubs
Computation: 13/52 * 12/51 * 11/50 = 11/850
c.
All are red card
Computation: 26/52 * 25/51 * 24/50 = 2/17
