Answer:
queen Elizabeth
Explanation:
because i read a book and queen Elizabeth was very fond of sir Raleigh and it was said that once he and she were walking and they got to a muddy puddle and he took off his cloak and spread it over the puddle so the royal feet would not get dirty, much to queen Elizabeth's amusement
Mark as brainlyest please
Hey there!
I actually just did a research paper on this topic, so I think I can help you out!
One possible reason why women do more caretaking work than men is due to a biological and historical association of women and taking care of children. This idea was first formed based on the fact that, since the beginning of humanity, many women have become the automatic caretakers of children and have more of an attachment to them. This is mostly due to the fact that they are the ones who carry and feed the child in its first stages of life. This connection with people in need, especially younger children, has led to women taking on more roles that involve caretaking and being naturally associated with these jobs more than men.
One consequence of this may be the negative impact on a female caretaker's mental health. Many women in these caretaking jobs are around people who are sick or unable to perform certain tasks by themselves. If seeing someone like this once may be saddening to someone, imagine what it must be like to interact with tons of people like this every week. Also, when people in this condition pass, this may take an additional toll on their caretaker's mental health since women (again) are naturally inclined to become attached to people like this.
Hope this helped you out! :-)
Answer:
C. Education and career preparation
Explanation:
Education and career preparation is usually conducted by a school establishment that is operated by a private entity or government's body, not the family (Typically, schools owned by the government are cheaper but lower in performance).
The family's role is closer to providing moral/principle standard toward the children , fulfilling their basic needs, and providing love/care to maintain children's psychological well being.
Answer: no, it is not a convincing argument
Explanation:
When the product was delivered it was safe and not defective. The instructions were clearly stated that the individual who uses the product must follow in order to ensure their safety. It is not the liability of the company if the person did not read those instructions and this doesn't prove a product to be defective just because the person did not follow proper instructions.
Eventhough it has a tendency to splash but instructions were given to protect the person from those splashes ; the warning was clearly stated.