The option available for Roddie would be "Roddie has no options under ADEA."
To understand this, we need to go through the terms of 'Age Discrimination Policy in Employment Act;'
- This Act covers the cases of employees or workers aging either 40 or above who have suffered age-based discrimination.
- The people aging under 40 are not covered under this act and hence, the benefits can not be reaped by them in any situation.
- This law doesn't allow the process of giving preference to an older employee over the younger to be considered illegal.
Hence, Roddie has no available options under ADEA as he is below 40(in fact only 30 years old) and he cannot claim under ADEA for justice.
Learn more about 'Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)' here: brainly.com/question/7239617
Answer:
Option (E) is correct.
Explanation:
For utility maximization,
Bob's consumption of Housing and food should be such that:
Here,
= 50
=20
Bob is not maximizing utility, as these two terms are not equal(50 > 20).
Since the marginal utility per rupee spent on housing is greater than that on food.
Hence, Bob can increase his utility just by consuming more of housing and less of food.
It depends on if u have ur license taken away or not. u can just go to the dmt and they will tell u whats up
Answer:
i believe it is the buyer, because they own the business, and the manager, because if the manager doesn't do their job, the whole business could go down.
Explanation:
Answer:
debit to Payroll Tax Expense for $44990
Explanation:
The journal entry is as follows
Payroll Tax Expense A/c Dr. $44,990
To FICA taxes withheld $25,610
To Federal unemployment taxes $2,680
To State unemployment taxes $16,700
(Being the accrual of employer’s payroll taxes is recorded)
For computing the payroll tax expense we simply added the FICA taxes withheld, federal unemployment taxes, and the state unemployment taxes
