Answer:
A tax cut does not cause workers to work significantly more hours. C).
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
Answer:
C. A federal system makes the government serve its citizens better because it allows for the existence of sub-units that have significant power.
Explanation:
A normative statement is a kind of statement which offers, the betterment, as includes a suggestion in the statement.
It is not descriptive statement, as it does not include any facts.
A descriptive statement states the facts and analyses the situations accordingly.
This statement is descriptive as rest above statements a and b includes facts.
And the statement d does not provide any suggestion, whereas only statement c provides a suggestion for the system.
Thus, correct option is
Statement c
Though markets can provide goods that are excludable but nonrival, they do so at the price of <u>inefficiency </u>
Explanation:
An excludable but non-rival product is also known as 'club goods'
Unlike public goods which are accessible to everyone and have no rivals, club goods are not accessible to everyone, only to those who can pay for them. At the same time, they have no rivals in the market.
This is a clear indication of an inefficient economy because such a product means there is a monopoly operating in the market.
An example of this can be a cable operator in an area. It dominates the market and has no rivals or competitors but its service is only accessible to people who can pay for it. However, in the same area, a Free Public television channel is the opposite, having no rivals but also being accessible.
To learn more about excludable but non-rival goods Click here: brainly.com/question/25498461
#SPJ4
Control introduce yourself and your company and express gratitude and remember names that goes a long way.
