Answer:
B
Explanation:
O It felt imperialism would keep unified Germany from breaking up.
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
Countries have changed over time by becoming more rich and evolving from slaves to factories and especially laws and moral some in a good or bad way.
Explanation:
Although the conflict divided tribes and villages, the war also saw the first extensive multi-tribal resistance to European colonization in North America and was the first war between Europeans and American Indians that did not end in complete defeat for the American Indians.
The correct answer is "<span>occupy eastern Poland</span>'. This was called the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, named after the foreign ministers of the two countries, which was a treaty in which the two powers divided Europe among themselves.