Answer:
-22,-6,-5,0,3,7,10
Step-by-step explanation:
It would be the highest negative integers in front, so going down, you'd reach 0. Then go up positive number 3,7,10.
I would think that this would be an example of what you are looking for. By the way, you are so pretty! :) Sorry if I am wrong, I will try again if you don't think it is right.
Answer:
A) Yes
B) No
C) No
D) No
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Yes, every telephone number that could occur in that community will have an equal chance of being generated because the telephone numbers were generated randomly.
B) No, this method of generating telephone numbers would not result in a simple random sample (SRS) of local residences because the first three digits were generated in a different random way than the last four digits.
C) No, this method would not generate an SRS of local voters because not everybody will be pick up when they call because they may not be at home or they may be too busy to pick up.
D) No, this method is not unbiased in generating samples of households because there will be nonresponse bias since not everyone will pick up the call
The range is all positive values...
R{y | y>0}
Range > "Y" such that y is greater than 0
Answer:
initial value is 21
Step-by-step explanation:
y=mx+b
6= -3(5) +b
b=21
