1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
13

How do you think new campaign methods affected american democracy?

History
1 answer:
Phantasy [73]3 years ago
5 0
It exercised democracy but also involved people more. I live in New Hampshire so it was just annoying. I didn't even try but i ended up seeing a candidate. they were everywhere
You might be interested in
Como podemos combatir la violación de los derechos?<br>pd: es para hoy ​
liraira [26]
El primer paso para prevenir las violaciones de los derechos humanos es conocerlos a fondo. Se dice que los hechos y la sabiduría, como todos sabemos, son fuertes. ¿Qué queremos decir exactamente cuando decimos "defiende tus derechos"? Dicho sin rodeos, debe conocer los derechos civiles y comprender a dónde ir o qué ir para obtener una compensación si se infringen sus reglas.
3 0
3 years ago
What happened when Hungary opened its borders? HURRYYYYYY!!!!!!
Angelina_Jolie [31]
The answer is, Thousands of people left East Germany. Just in case someone doesn't have time to read that long explanation in the previous answer. IM not sure what their answer was but I took the test on Edenuity and this is the correct answer.
7 0
3 years ago
Forcing people who broke laws to become slaves was a similarity between
Bess [88]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What territory did Britain gain from the French and Indian War?
Ratling [72]
Hi!
The <span> France gave up all its territories in mainland <span>North America
Hope I helped!
</span></span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the main differences between the editorialist from the Chicago Times and President Lincoln on the purpose of the Civil
Vilka [71]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The main differences between the editorialist from the Chicago Times and President Lincoln on the purpose of the Civil War were the following.

The United States President Abraham Lincoln referred to the purpose of the Civil War in his famous Gettysburg speech, delivered on November 19, 1863.

He was in a ceremony in the National Cemetery located in Pennsylvania when he paid tribute to the American soldiers that had died in the war. And exhorted the people to follow the principles of liberty and justice that characterized the United States.

On the other hand, the editorial published in the Chicago Times criticized Lincoln and his message. The editorial published was: <em>"The cheeks of American people must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat, and dishwatery utterances."</em>

The editorialists expressed that Lincoln's message was not a good one and out of context.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The earliest city in history to have a million inhabitants was?
    8·2 answers
  • A historian writes a book in which she organizes the history of Europe into these units: the middle ages, the enlightenment,and
    11·1 answer
  • How did Hitler justify his invasion of austria
    8·1 answer
  • The situation in which the amount of available money increases faster than the amount of available goods is known as?
    7·2 answers
  • How many European countries had colonies in Africa in 1960?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the US got involved with Berlin Germany
    5·1 answer
  • IM TIRED OF THIS SO SOMEONE PLS HELP ME
    14·1 answer
  • People opposed Columbus’ plan because they thought the world was flat.<br><br> True<br><br> False
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Apostle Paul saying in Romans 5:1-11?
    11·1 answer
  • What was a major advantage of the Patriots during the American Revolution?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!