(C) Their kingdom was divided into two, Israel and Judah, after Solomon’s death.
Answer:
The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty had different views of the world and their place in it. Islam under the Ottoman Empire and Neo-Confucianism under the Ming Dynasty influenced the political, economic, military, and diplomatic interactions with others outside of their realm.
Explanation:
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>
The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
Three aspects would technology, goverment and cultural diffusion hope this helps
