1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kipiarov [429]
2 years ago
10

How have international relations shaped and guided the development of the United States, specifically the nation’s government, p

eople, and history?
History
1 answer:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.

The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.

This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.

International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.

You might be interested in
2. How did the company rule influence the states?​
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Administered by the East India Company functioning as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown and regulated by the British Parliament. Governor-General.

They sought to select who would take the throne after them and who would be given administrative positions. The Company occasionally coerced the nations into forming a "subsidiary alliance". The conditions of this alliance prohibited the rulers of India from having their own independent armed forces.

The contemporary multinational has its roots in the English East India Company. Its global commerce network imported Asian luxuries including teas, silk, and spices. However, it also used opium to open up China's marketplaces and its private army to conquer most of India. They had a stranglehold on India's sizable market and cotton resources thanks to British economic policy. India functioned as a sizable captive market for British-produced products as well as a substantial source of raw materials for British industries.

Equal protection under the law: In all the Indian regions they directly controlled, the British enacted standardized laws. As a result, they helped lessen caste inequality in Indian society by denying upper caste members conventional social benefits.

Learn more about company rules:

brainly.com/question/16923117

#SPJ9

6 0
1 year ago
Which of the following is true of the Truman Doctrine?
Zigmanuir [339]
"<span>A. It amounted to an informal declaration of Cold War" would be the best option, but it was not even remotely formal--in that it simply said that the US would come to the aid of any countries in danger of becoming communist. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
The Pullman Strike resulted in
Leni [432]
Strike affected rail transportation nationwide, essentially bringing American business to a halt. Workers resented not only cut in wages, but management's intrusiveness into their personal lives. The federal government became involved, with federal troops being sent to open railroads.






Hope this helps :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was an advantage held by the north during the civil war
ICE Princess25 [194]
<span>One of the advantage held by the north during the civil war is the North had superior military leaders. At the flare-up of the American Civil War, both the North and South trusted the contention would be over rapidly. In any case, focal points for both the Confederacy and the Union implied a delayed war between the states.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Cuando fue Martin luterano king arrestado
Nadya [2.5K]
En 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. fue detenido y enviado a la cárcel porque él y otros protestaban por el trato que recibían los negros en Birmingham, Alabama. Un tribunal había ordenado que King no podía celebrar protestas en Birmingham.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is congress the "linchpin" of the "establishment"?
    8·1 answer
  • -Aaron A. Bradley
    15·2 answers
  • Someone please help me
    10·2 answers
  • What did many northerners like James Pike and Carl Schurz come to believe about race and reconstruction by the mid-1870s?
    9·1 answer
  • Defenition of mesopatamia
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Confederate States refer to the Constitution when they voted to
    6·1 answer
  • What were four social effects of the California gold rush ?
    9·1 answer
  • What do you think about suppressing certain evidence because it has been obtained illegally? How does it relate to the Constitut
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, 5-STAR RATING, AND THANK YOU!!! 8PTS GUARENTEED! Helpful answers appreciate
    8·1 answer
  • One of the Underground Railroad's main activities was:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!