Answer:
The court concluded truthfully, as he had done all the analysis and acknowledged the documentation and investment purposes.
The program scammed funds which might have been used for small-income housing by the government agency.
<em>United States v. McGuire, 744 F.2d 1197 (Cir. 11, 1984).</em>
Answer:
The Answer is 39.769 miles
<span>The farmer is better off being a farmer. After 1 year the farmer will have made 900,000 off of 300,000 baskets. Minus the lease of land and payment of workers, the farmer will have over 650,000. Leave that in the bank and do it another year, interest at 22% would net around 147,000. Add that to 650kx2. That equals a little over 1.4 million. So in closing, farmer is more lucrative than shoe salesman.</span>
Answer:
a.Maria can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.
Explanation:
Maria has been in restaurant firm, for more than 5 years until the current year. So, she is an active participant. Hence, her active loss in her active activity - restaurant loss 80000 can be offset against $150,000 income from the retail store.
