Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>True
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The saving rate is rate; the expenses go low as the curves shift to the right. There are various ways that investment falls. If the loan cost rises, state due to contractionary money related or financial approach, speculation will fall. Thus, in the short run, the expansionary monetary arrangement will likewise make investment fall as swarming out happens. Another fascinating reason for a fall with regards to speculation is an exogenous decline in venture spending. This occurs when firms choose to contribute less without respect for the loan cost.
Answer:
There were new crops; tools and farming methods, which helped, increase food production. These changes meant less death to smaller colonies, and overall improve the state of living. They now could live longer and have better sanitation compared to the earlier imperialism.
Explanation:
science can help improve technology and this can allow a civilization to grow and flourish better and save lives of sick and injured
