1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rama09 [41]
3 years ago
7

3. What pivotal role did the Vietnam War play in changing U.S. military policy in the Cold War?

History
1 answer:
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
6 0
My Answer: Nixon recognized the citizen's Republic of China in an attempt to diminish the USSR's global influence. 

Hope I helped! :D

You might be interested in
How many tell them how to worship and show respect to god?
Novay_Z [31]
What exactly are you asking?
8 0
3 years ago
Why is baltic sea called scandinacian mediterranean
ycow [4]
The Baltic Sea was in Scandinavia and was a smaller but longer version of the Mediterranean.
4 0
3 years ago
Political persecution and poor economic conditions are two examples of a _____ factor in migration.
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
Answer would be a push factor
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Scientific Revolution work together to advance individualism and secularism
VLD [36.1K]
These phenomenal age paved way to the age of "enlightenment" where there was a loosely organized intellectual movement, secular, rationalist, liberal, and egalitarian in outlook and values, that flourished in the middle decades of the eighteenth century. The name was self-bestowed, and the terminology of darkness and light was identical in the major European languages. <span>The Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and came to advance ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, </span>fraternity<span>, </span>constitutional government<span>, and </span>separation of church and state.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is this state meant true or false
    12·1 answer
  • In the nineteenth century, many American and European artists were fascinated with Japanese designs and prints. In fact, some We
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the U.S government wanted to remove Soviet missiles form Cuba?
    5·2 answers
  • Which was a claim of Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev?
    8·2 answers
  • Before the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, total output of the Roman and Chinese economies increased at ______ their pop
    15·1 answer
  • What was the Columbian Exchange and how has it effected you personally?
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HELP THIS IS DUE LIKE TODAY!!! PLS PLS PLS PLS THANKS :)
    12·1 answer
  • (pg. 298 – 299) IN CONTEXT – analyze the impact of the printing press on the spread of Protestantism and the divisions within in
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the world's first epic
    14·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers. Which two phrases best describe the underlying objectives of President Wilson's Fourteen Points
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!