George Fox was a leader in a 17th-century Christian awakening from which came the Quaker movement (now known as the Society of Friends or the Friends Church). During civil strife between royalist and parliamentary forces, the movement spread rapidly across England and in American colonies, in spite of harassment under Commonwealth and Restoration governments that brought property loss, imprisonment, and sometimes death. By the end of the century, there were 100,000 Quakers, an American colony (Pennsylvania), and a strong public witness to Christian holiness, peace, religious freedom, participatory worship, business integrity and social justice.
Many early adherents were drawn from Seeker communities of Northern England. These Christians, disillusioned with monopolistic state religion, whether Catholic, Anglican, Presbyterian, or Independent, had been meeting informally for Bible study and prayer. George Fox forcefully articulated their criticism of the institutional church for its secondhand faith, sin-excusing doctrine, hireling ministry, and compromise with political powers. People responded eagerly to his proclamation of a new Day of the Lord in which the true church is being recovered and kingdom righteousness effected through Christ's presence and power.
Om Prezi;;;The Knight and The Squire Differences and Similarities Similarities 1) They are family, the knight is the squire's father.
2) The Squire and Knight are both chivalrous and respectful, though the Squire is to a much lesser degree.
3)They are both courteous and humble, too.
4)Both the Knight and the squire are members of the Aristocrat class. Squire 1) A very vivacious, or lively, personality
can be compared to the modern day person, or a prince charming of sorts
2)Twenty year old lustful bachelor
<span>3)Stylish and Daring clothing </span>
(very short gown)
4)Perfectly curled hair
5)Selfish Outlook
6) Supposed to be a knight-in-training.
<span>7)Exaggeration of Falseness </span>
within the Squire Knight 1) Perfect Gentleman
2) Still dressed in undershirt and rust stained mail
3) Believes in the ideals of Chivalry
4) Honest, Truthful, and Faithful
5) Always well mannered
6) Professional Soldier
7) Chaucer gave an exaggeration of perfectness to the Knight dssdasdasfsa Differences 1) The Knight is a warrior, but the squire is more an artist (singing, poetry)
2) The Knight takes his duty very seriously, the squire is just along for the fun.
3)The squire is more concerned with his appearance and social status than the training his father is giving him.
4) Knight has much more experience (proven himself in battle, etc.) but the squire acts like he does not want the experiences. To the best of Chaucer's description, the knight is perfect at not only his job, but as a person also. Chaucer has nonstop praise for the Knight. He believes that the Knight is a profound person.
Chaucer views the Knight with great respect. He admires the Knight, and sees no negative in his personality. Chaucer sees the squire as an amusing and talented person, however also as a very bad squire. The squire is a failure because he is training to be a knight, but never wants to become one.
<span>Chaucer is amused by the squire, and cannot see him becoming a knight, but rather a lover and an artist. Chaucer might not see the squire as a bad person, but without a doubt he is a terrible squire.</span>
Historical Cycle or sometimes a recurring theme
Answer:
accepting some feedback from others
Explanation:
Tagalog ng nga Hindi mo pa Alam
