If you would like to know Mike's tax, you can calculate this using the following steps:
a market value ... 310000
the property ... 40% of the market value = 40% * 310000 = 40/100 * 310000 = 124000
the tax rate ... 145.10 per 1000 of assessed valuation
145.10 ... 1000 of assessed valuation
x ... 124000 of assessed valuation
____________________________
145.10 * 124000 = 1000 * x /1000
x = 145.10 * 124000 / 1000
x = 17992.4 (Mike's tax)
The correct result would be: Mike's tax is 17992.4.
Answer:
(1,-2) and (6, 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps ^-^
Answer:
28
Step-by-step explanation:
10-38=28
$&#:÷&#&;#&$;'ebsjdkeowkdbs;#&$;'fbxjrbxjr
1613 divided by 213
Answer: 8 loaves (if rounded)
Answer:
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to know which type of variable represent the weigth and the height. Let's analyze one by one the options given:
A. Ordinal
False since by definition an ordinal variable is "is a categorical variable for which the possible values are ordered". And for this case the height and the weigth are not categorical since represent quantitative data.
B. Nominal
False by definition and ordinal variable is which one that can't be represented by numeric values, and for this case the weight and the height are not example of this definition.
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
D. Interval
False on this scale we don't have a clear definition of the 0. And for this case the heigth and the weight have a known definition of the 0 corresponding to the absence of mass. And since the ratios are meaingful for the heigth and the weigth then can't be an interval variable.