Answer:
Quantitative judgments are mainly based on statistical analysis of acquired data, whereas subjective judgments are dependent on a variety of algorithms such as data kind and quality, influencing variables, hazard identification, and etc.
Consider qualitative aspects that may affect your decision to buy items from a third-party vendor. The supplier's dependability, the quality of its administration, and the grade of its commodities are instances of such criteria.
Leadership skills,knowledge of a foreign language
<u>Answer:</u>
All of the following are business-level cooperative strategic alliances EXCEPT D) Synergistic strategic alliances.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Business-level Cooperative strategies are used by the firms when they want to grow and improve the performance in the market of individual products. All this is achieved through various strategic alliances: Complementary Strategic Alliance, Competition-response, Uncertainty-reducing, and Competition-reducing strategic alliance. These alliances help overcome various problems of a business in the corporate world.
After listing all these strategies, it is clear that a Synergistic strategic alliance is not a part of business-level cooperative strategic alliances which means that option D is the correct choice.
Synergistic strategic alliance is a kind of agreement among business entities where they can work together to increase their overall output.
Answer: The marginal utility is 2
Explanation:
Utility is the satisfaction derived from the consumption of a particular commodity. Total utility is the total satisfaction derived from the consumption of a particular commodity. Marginal utility is the extra satisfaction that a consumer gets from consuming a product. Utility is measured in utils.
Marginal utility increases with an extra consumption of a good at first but later it begins to reduce as the extra good consumed doesn't really have give the consumer enough satisfaction anymore.
Regarding the question, eating 5 hotdogs gives 40 utils and eating 6 hotdogs gives 42 utils.
The marginal utility is the extra utils which will be 42-40 which gives 2 utils.
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
