Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
But before reaching to the final answers, first do the following calculations
Cash collected $108000
Add Services performed in 2017(not collected) $36000
less Services performed in 2016(collected in 2017) $25000
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Cash paid in 2017 $72,000
Add Expense incurred not yet paid for 2017 $42000
Less Expense paid for 2016 -$30000
Expense for 2016 $84000
Now
a. Cash basis
Revenue $108000
Less Expenses -$72,000
Net income $36000
b. Accrual basis
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Less Expenses for 2017 $84,000
Net income $35,000
Answer: a. $1,000.0m
Explanation:
Even though the company's enterprise value has no growth, the equity investment of the sponsor will rise from $500.0m when purchased to $1,000.0m when the target for the value of the enterprise is sold for $1500.0m.
The debt was $1000m at year 0 while the remaining $500m was for equity. It should be noted that at the fifth year, equity will be $1,000.0m while the debt will be $500m.
Answer:
bu kin jhu
Explanation:
John jvghh bugs HHH jhu UV juggle
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.
