Answer:
The answer is:
1 - Underutilization
2 - Efficiency
3 - Unattainability
Explanation:
Efficiency in economics means a situation in which all resources are optimally distributed to serve each entity in the best way while minimizing waste and inefficiency.
Underutilization in economics is also a a situation in which lesser resources are being utilized than the economy is capable of utilizing.
Unattainability is a situation in which what one to accomplish or achieve is not possible.
1 - Underutilization
2 - Efficiency
3 - Unattainability
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price elasticity of demand = 0.5
Percentage increase in price = 8%
Price elasticity of demand = 
0.5 = 
Percentage change in quantity demanded = 0.5 × 8
= 4%
Therefore, if the price rises by 8% then as a result quantity demanded decreases by 4%.
Answer:
cannot sue John for the extra $250 asJohn made the promise to him based on past consideration.
Explanation:
When Gerald was helping John build the garage, there was no agreement between them on payment for services. After the two weeks John made the promise to pay Gerald.
This is not a binding promise as John is paying Gerald at his own discretion as a past consideration, since no contract was agreed between them.
Answer:
Karl Marx
Explanation:
Karl Marx was a German economist that lived in the 19th century. His definition of capital as the most important factor of production was actually quite accurate and advanced for his time. He was the first major economist to state that capital by itself was enough to generate wealth.
He also proposed socialism as the higher stage of capitalism, which actually works in many European nations which are considered social democracies, e.g. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Germany, etc., and at the same have the highest standards of living in the world.
Personally, I believe that his major flaw was to go a few steps further and believe in communism and that it would solve all of humanity's problems. Communism is not the same of socialism, since socialism believes in an economy under the influence of the state but also supports individual merit and private property. E.g. someone that works hard should be paid more, i.e. personal wealth is not bad. On the other hand, communism believes that the state must control the economy and that individuals should be rewarded based on their needs, not their work. It doesn't matter if you work hard or not even work at all, the state must satisfy your needs.
Answer:
c. The capital gain would be automatically re-invested at NAV if not taken in cash while the purchase of the shares would occur at POP including a sales charge.
Explanation:
An Asset appreciation doesn't in any way complete a breakpoint for a client. The client agreed to buy $50,000 of fund shares under a Letter of Intent to get a lower sales charge. If the customer doesn't deposit the full $50,000, then the sales charge is calculated to a higher percentage, which is based on the customer's purchase. The customer must deposit another $10,000 to complete the breakpoint.
If the customer were to take the capital gains distribution as cash and use that money to buy additional shares to complete the breakpoint, the customer would then have to pay a sales charge, which would be lower because the breakpoint is being completed. The customer must know that if the capital gains distribution were reinvested, it would occur at NAV and there would be no sales charge increase in sales charge. Whether the capital gain is taken as cash or it is reinvested, it is taxable.
