Incurable depreciation refers to items of depreciation that either are physically impossible to cure or are too expensive to be worth curing. If the cost to fix the problem exceeds the loss in value caused by the problem, then it does not make economic sense to repair it.
<h3>Incurable deterioration</h3>
Incurable deterioration is a type of depreciation that is considered incurable even if the repairs were to be made. In simple terms, the cost of repairing the item(s) exceeds the value it would add, and, therefore, there is no economic benefit to fixing them.
Economic obsolescence refers to the loss of value of a real estate property that is caused by factors that are external to the property.
To learn more about Incurable depreciation visit the link
brainly.com/question/28083466
#SPJ4
The late 1800’s-early 1900’s were a trying time for the nation of Russia due to many events. These harsh times began in the 1890’s with the bad living and working conditions in the country that led to many strikes and revolts. A major revolt occurred in 1905 after the creation of radical factions/political parties. The Tsar (ruler) was not able to keep control or repair the sluggish economy. In both, 1905 and 1914 Russia found itself at war, which both led to embarrassing defeats, revolution, and the overthrow of the Tsar.
It does not connect the Mediterranean Sea with the Red Sea. It is only fed into by the Jordan River, it doesn't have an outflow.
Answer:
The best way to illustrate the frequencies for each political preference is a bar graph.
Explanation:
A bar graph is a graphical representation of data and it belongs to the frequency graphs. It is the best way to illustrate the frequencies of political preference because it is very easy to interpret and it shows the relative sizes: you can see which political preference is the most common and which is the least, at one glance.
Answer:
The correct answer is <em>c. the CISG (Contracts for the International Sale of Goods).</em>
Explanation:
Any international convention signed by two or more countries must contemplate the internal laws of each of the signatory countries. The convention gives a more specific legal framework on the aspects contemplated therein but cannot contradict the legal principles and parameters of the signatory countries.
In the specific case of a convention on the exchange of goods between companies in the United States and Argentina, companies belonging to both countries must carry out their operations of buying and selling products according to the legal principles and parameters established in such regulations.
In the event that one of the companies or one of the National States understood that the requirements set forth in the convention are not being met, it must establish the legal claims before the agency that the convention would have arranged for the arbitration of such situation. This body could be an international court, a binational court, a court of a third country, a court belonging to one of both countries, etc.
An important dispute recently occurred between the Argentine State and Companies based in the United States over a Sovereign Debt issue. The North American companies owned debt bonds of the Argentine national State.
As in this case it had been previously signed that any dispute would be resolved in a New York court, so it happened and the Argentine government had to accept the opinion of Judge Griesa, of New York, paying off the debt and allowing the country to leave the default in which he was previously. This is a clear example of how to proceed in situations of international legal order based on the signing of a previous treaty.
