Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
Answer:
<u>b. False</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>Remember, </em>the term social responsibility in this context refers to an individual doing what would benefit society first, over any gain he may derive if he does otherwise.
For example, we are told that there is "low paying wages in Belize," which means low worker welfare, thus, even if no labor laws were been broken in his country, Olivia has a social responsibility to pay fair prices for the necklaces and earrings.
Answer:
$4.67 per share
Explanation:
The calculation of the diluted earning per share is given below:
= (Total income - preference dividends) ÷ (outstanding shares + diluted shares)
where,
Total income is $50,000
Outstanding shares is 10,000
And, the diluted shares is computed by following calculations
Amount paid towards shares = Options issued × Exercise price per share
= 1,000 × $6
= $6,000
And,
Value of options = Amount paid towards shares ÷ Current market price
= $6,000 ÷ $20
= 300
Therefore,
Diluted shares is
= Options issued - value of options
= 1,000 - 300
= 700
So Diluted Earnings per share is
= ($50,000) ÷ (10,000 + 700)
= $4.67 per share
Answer:
$800,000
Explanation:
The computation of the taxes paid by the company in 2013 is shown below:
Year Taxable Income Carry forward amount Year-end amount
2010 -$4,000,000 $0
2011 $1,000,000 - $4,000,000 $3,000,000
2012 $2,000,000 -$3,000,000 $1,000,000
2013 $3,000,000 -$1,000,000 $2,000,000
Now the tax paid is
= $2,000,000 × 40%
= $800,000
Answer:
Franchise
Explanation:
This is a business arrangement where the owner of a successful business gives the right (through special business and legal arrangement) to another, to run such business in a specified location using his brand name in accordance with agreed terms and conditions. Under this arrangement, technical support and training are always provided by the franchiser.
The franchisor charges the franchisee a fee for the right which in most cases is periodic. The franchise is renewable.
