<span>Your question lacks some context. So, I am going to assume that you are talking about relates to America as a whole. If my assumption is right, I'd have to say that the answer is false because they are at the state level and the federal level outranks it. For instance, if Texas passes a law abolishing a minimum wage, the law on federal minimum wage still must be followed.</span>
Yes, stores should be forced to obey minimum prices for a good or a company that is selling a service should as well. They should have to obey by this so that price competition isn't ongoing in the market. Larger producers can often charge a smaller amount for a product because they are producing them in high qualities. By charging less it gives them a competitive advantage over their competition in means of price. Unless the item is on clearance because a company is discontinuing stock of that item, they should have a set minimum as they do a set maximum they are allowed to charge for that item.
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Cash flow= $2,250
n= 4
i= 5%
Additional investment= $3,000
<u>First, we need to calculate the future value using the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {2,250*[(1.05^4) - 1]} / 0.05
FV= 9,697.78 + 3,000
FV= $12,697.78
<u>Now, the present value:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 12,697.78/(1.05^4)
PV= $10,446.5
