Jeremy Bentham was not an utopian socialist during the 19th-century.
So, the answer is option B. Jeremy Bentham.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The Quakers rejected slavery on the grounds that it contradicted the Christian concept of brotherhood.
Explanation:
The Quakers are a religious movement that originated among Christian English dissenters in the mid-17th century. At the end of the 1600s, many Quaker immigrants emigrated to North America, where William Penn founded Pennsylvania.
Quakers imagine that there is something of God within every human being, which, like an inner light, can guide one. The movement emphasizes that each person must find his or her own way to God, that God exists within every human being, and that the personal experience of God is the only guidance a human can have. Therefore, as God lived in every human, even in African-Americans, men were all equal and as a consequence brothers under God. This religious view, therefore, made them reject slavery during the 19th Century.
Answer:
One of the one-day bus boycotts in Montgomery was to protest Rosa Parks's arrest and segregation in general
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rosa Parks' arrest started the Bus Boycott, during which the dark residents of Montgomery wouldn't ride the city's transports in a fight over the transport framework's arrangement of racial isolation. It was the primary mass-activity of the cutting edge social liberties period and filled in as a motivation to other social equality activists the country over.
Jim Crow transport laws in Montgomery at the hour of Parks' capture set up a segment for whites at the front of the transport, and a part for blacks in the back.
Answer:
Second two party system (1828 - 1854)
Explanation:
The Second Party System refers to a political system in the United States between 1828 and 1854, which was characterized by the dominance of two parties, the Democratic and the Whig parties, as well as an increase in citizen participation in politics and elections.
The First Party System, which existed roughly between 1792 - 1824, collapsed during the presidential elections of 1824 with the split of the then ruling Democratic-Republican party, with 4 candidates of the same party running for president. In the years between both systems, political parties pretty much disappeared from the public eye. However, Andrew Jackson, who was a very popular politician, created the Democratic Party and won the 1828 presidential election. The creation of the Whig Party in 1832 gave rise to the other element of the Second Party System.
However, the New Republican Party, which remained a minor party during much of this time, finally rose to prominence after the collapse of the Whig Party in 1852. By this time, the Third Party System, which existed until the end of the century, was characterized by the dominance of the New Republican and Democratic parties.
hough the War of 1812 was dubbed “Mr. Madison’s War,” his role in the prosecution of the war was relatively ineffectual. Elected in 1808, President James Madison was intimately familiar with the ongoing diplomatic and trade conflicts with Britain. As Secretary of State under President Jefferson, he was the principal architect of the “restrictive system” of trade embargos designed to force Britain to relax its control of Atlantic trade. Madison’s support of this failed system lasted well into the war itself.
Madison’s attempts to resolve disagreements with Britain peacefully was viewed by some in his own Republican party as a sign of weakness. A group of pro-war Republicans, led by Speaker of the House Henry Clay, argued that military force was the only option left to combat British imperiousness. These “War Hawks” were not a majority of the party, but over time, their influence acted on more skeptical party members.
President Madison eventually did bring a declaration of war to Congress, but his leadership in planning for war was mostly absent. Republican ideology was intensely skeptical of the concept of a national standing army, preferring to rely on state militias, and the Madison administration, following in the footsteps of Jefferson, did much to starve national military forces of men and material support. His influence on Congress was minimal, and in retrospect, it is hard to understand how he, or the War Hawks for that matter, felt that the United States had the necessary military resources to prosecute a war on multiple fronts.
