Answer:
1,073.54 total interest
Explanation:
39,000 x 9% x 80days/360 = 780 interest expense
Payment 4,200 - 780 = 3,420 deducted form the note:
39,000 - 3,420 = 35,580
35,580 x 9% x 33/360 = 293.54 interest expense
6,200 - 293.54 = 5,906.47 deduced form the note
35,580 - 5,906.47 = 29,673,53
293.54 interest expense
780 interest expense
1,073.54 total interest
Answer:
The correct answer is (e)
Explanation:
Digital currency, such as bitcoin is out of government’s control. Similarly, the market decides their price and that makes them unpredictable. Likewise, the digital money has various problems that make them different and hard to trust on, such as, they can’t be used as means of payment, the unit of account, store of value and standard value. Because fiat money is equipped with all those advantages, which is why people doubt that current forms of digital will replace traditional money.
Answer:
The projects which maximize Vanguard's shareholder wealth are Project A; Project B; Project D.
Explanation:
Projects which maximize the shareholder value are projects delivering Expected Returns which are higher than its risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
As a result, Project A with Expected return of 15% and risk adjusted WACC of 12%; Project B with Expected return of 12% and risk adjusted WACC of 10%; Project D with Expected return of 9% and risk adjusted WACC of 8%; are the projects that maximize the shareholder's value.
On the other hand, Project C with Expected return of 11% and risk adjusted WACC of 12% is harmful to shareholder value.
Answer:
Ethical Dissonance
Explanation:
Ethical Dissonance refers to a divide between an individual desired moral identity and the benefit they derive from acting against such ethical codes, conducts, beliefs or values.
The culture of the company is not in alignment with the my ethical codes', because its approach to reporting amounts cannot be justified from a GAAP perspective, the ethical issues of concern is Ethical Dissonance
Answer:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
Explanation:
For this case the graph attached illustrate the problem for this case
We know that the total area is 60000, so then we have:
If we solve for x we got:
(1)
Now we can define the cost function like this:
We can use the condition (1) and if we replace in the cost function we have:
Since we need to minimize the cost, we can derivate the function in terms of y and we got:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
