Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Part A</u>
A vertical stretch takes place when 
given that 
<u>Part B</u>
A vertical compression takes place when given that 
<u>Part C</u>
A vertical stretch is different than a horizontal compression:
- In a vertical stretch, the input stays the same, but the output is multiplied by the scale factor
- In a horizontal compression, the output stays the same, but the input is multiplied by the scale factor
<u>Part D</u>
A reflection across the x-axis means that the output, our y-variable, is the opposite sign. This means that all values of 
must be negative such that as mentioned in parts A and B. Also, in part C, since our scale factor is negative, the output is the only one being multiplied by the scale factor.
Answer:
5 blocks
Step-by-step explanation:
5 blocks for every barometer
Answer:
(0,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
For this, you need to use the midpoint formula.
(-3) + 3 2 + (-2)
-------------- , ----------------
2 2
This leads to:
-3 + 3 = 0 -> 0/2
x = 0
3 + (-3) = 0 -> 0/2
The answer is:
(0, 0)
Answer:
the standard form of this equation will be 3z^4 + 2z^3 - z^2 + 5z
Step-by-step explanation:
as much as I would like to, I'm really not that good at explaining things
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.
