Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
So I'm assuming when you typed "log yhat=.4785 + 1.468x", you meant to write: 
. And generally a logarithm can be written in the form 
which can then be rewritten as 
, but since the log has no base, it's assumed to be 10. So in this case you have the equation:
, which can then be written in exponential form as:
Answer:
log₃(243) = x
Step-by-step explanation:
3^x = 243
Rule: a^x = b -> logₐ(b) = x
log₃(243) = x
11% not 100% sure Bc I calculated but hope it helped!
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
Answer:
9.093
Step-by-step explanation:
Of means multiply
.7 * 12.99
9.093
