Why is a rigid motion also Called a congruence transformation?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Recall that a rigid motion is that that preserves the distances while undergoing a motion in the plane. This is also called an isometry, rigid transformations, or congruence transformations and there are four different types. Therefore, for the translation to be considered "rigid" the two figures must be congruent by definition of a rigid motion.

Hope this helps!

~Mia

malfutka [58]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:The transformation does not change the size or shape of the figure Therefore, the transformation appears to be a rigid motion. The transformation changes the shape of the figure. Therefore, the transformation does not appear to be a rigid motion.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

13. Here is one way Maleka proved that 2(5 + 2) + 2s is equivalent to

Kaylis [27]

Malaria proved that the equation you need to add the parenthesis first

3 0

3 years ago

(b) A shopkeeper gives 20% discount on the marked price of a television set. The VAT amount at the rate of 13% is Rs. 2,600. Fin

iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

6.3

Step-by-step explanation:

i had the same question for school

6 0

2 years ago

Find the slope of the line that contains the points (-9, -3) and (-19, -3).

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

Slope (m) = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

We will use this formula to find the slope⤵⤵⤵

$\frac{y _{2} - y _{1} }{x _{2} - x _{1} }$

(Sorry if it's a bit small btw)

Now we plug in the values accordingly:

-3 - (-3) = -3 + 3 = 0

-19 - (-9) = -19 + 9 = -10

Slope = 0/-10

So we have 0/-10, which means our slope is actually just 0.

(This also means that the line on the graph will be horizontal.)

Hope this helps you :)

7 0

2 years ago

On a map, the distance from Akron to Cleveland measures 2 centimeters. What is the actual distance if the scale of the map shows

WINSTONCH [101]

To answer this question you will set up the proportion shown in the attached picture.

There are 2 ways to solve this.

1. You can create an equivalent ratio by determining the factor that will take you from 1 cm to 2 cm and apply his factor to the 19 miles.

The answer would be 19 x 2= 38 miles for 2 centimeters.

2. The second strategy is to use cross products to get an answer. You multiply the number diagonal from each other. See picture for this work.